Product · Explainable AIResult #SIM-2048 · evidence chain

No conclusion
without its reasoning.

Every result can be linked back to the individuals, responses, and reasoning that produced it. From the aggregate result down to the individual interview.

See the method
Conclusion
67 %Recommended scenario

« Predictability matters more than price level. »

DimensionPredictability
DimensionPerceived fairness
DimensionRoom for maneuver
  • Illustrative portrait of a synthetic individual
    Claire · #04 812 337

    « What costs me most is not knowing in advance. »

  • Illustrative portrait of a synthetic individual
    Samuel · #05 663 028

    « I can accept a higher price if it remains understandable. »

  • Illustrative portrait of a synthetic individual
    Inès · #03 447 190

    « I am more willing to accept it when the rules are the same for everyone. »

  • Illustrative portrait of a synthetic individual
    Malik · #02 118 904

    « I want to be able to compare before I commit. »

Trace back to source

67% is not an answer.
It is the top of a chain of reasoning.

  1. 67 %Selected scenario
  2. 3Explanatory dimensions
  3. 21Typologies
  4. 12 480Interviews used
  5. 1Individual
    Illustrative portrait of a synthetic individual
    Claire · #04 812 337

    « What costs me most is not knowing in advance how much I will pay. »

Unfold the result

A conclusion can be unfolded.

Conclusion

Price predictability increases acceptance, even when the average price remains higher.

Result #SIM-2048 · scenario B
DimensionPredictability
TypologyRegular travelers sensitive to uncertainty
IndividualClaire · #04 812 337Illustrative portrait of a synthetic individual
InterviewQuestion / answer / follow-up
  • Agent

    What really bothers you about this pricing?

  • Claire

    It is not so much the amount. It is having to keep checking prices.

  • Agent

    What if the price were known three months in advance?

  • Claire

    I would book earlier, even if it were sometimes slightly higher.

From the individual to the structure

One opinion is an anecdote.
Ten thousand coherent lines of reasoning reveal a structure.

  • Illustrative portrait of a synthetic individual« I want to know in advance. »
  • Illustrative portrait of a synthetic individual« I want to be able to compare. »
  • Illustrative portrait of a synthetic individual« I refuse to keep monitoring prices. »
  • Illustrative portrait of a synthetic individual« Stability has value. »
  • Illustrative portrait of a synthetic individual« I would rather pay a little more and be able to decide. »
DimensionPredictability42 %Explanatory weight
  • Predictability42 %
  • Fairness21 %
  • Room for maneuver16 %
  • Habits12 %
  • Trust9 %
Comparison

All AI systems produce answers.
Not all of them let you understand how those answers were produced.

Generative AIResearch & panelsImagine All The People
Origin of the resultModel generationField dataSimulated population
Access to individualsNoAccording to protocolSimulated individuals accessible
Access to verbatimsNot nativeYesInterviews retained
Replay the experienceYes, with variabilityCostlyReplayable simulation
Trace the result back to the individualLimitedPossible manuallyNative chain down to the individual

Show us a conclusion.
We will show you exactly where it comes from.

Your turn

Which decision
do you want to be able to explain ?

  • Understand rejection
  • Identify a friction point
  • Compare two scenarios
  • Audit a result

Free trial, no credit card required. Your data remains confidential.

Your next decision

Which decision do you want to explore?

Describe your need. We can point you to the right level of support.