Science · Benchmarks

A publicly documented protocol, reproducible by third parties.

Maximum Entropy Relaxation is compared with generalized raking under a common protocol based on NPORS-derived data, with 4 to 40 attributes and different levels of constraints.

Publication: ArXiv:2603.22558 — Status: Preprint · not peer reviewed

METHODS COMPAREDMaximum Entropy RelaxationGeneralized rakingCOMMON PROTOCOLNPORS-derived4 to 40 attributesUnary, binaryand ternary constraintsREADOUTDeviations fromtargetdistributionsSame dataset, same constraints, same deviation measures.Diagram of the setup: no result values are shown.
01The question tested

What happens as complexity increases?

The benchmark does not seek to establish that one method is inherently better. It observes how two methods behave as the number of simultaneous attributes and the arity of constraints increase.

02The protocol

What is compared, and on which data.

Method evaluatedMaximum Entropy Relaxation
Reference methodgeneralized raking
DataNPORS-derived
Attributes4 to 40
Constraintsunary, binary, ternary

SourceFrançois Pachet, Jean-Daniel Zucker — Maximum Entropy Relaxation of Multi-Way Cardinality Constraints for Synthetic Population Generation, ArXiv, April 2026 (preprint, not peer reviewed)ArXiv:2603.22558 View

03The measure

Deviations from target distributions.

The comparison variable is deviation from target distributions, read separately at the unary, binary and ternary levels rather than aggregated into a single indicator.

UNARY1 attributeBINARY2 crossed attributesTERNARY3 crossed attributesConceptual illustration: the number of combinations to satisfy increases with arity.
04The result

K ≥ 28.

42840NUMBER OF SIMULTANEOUS ATTRIBUTES (K), NPORS-DERIVED PROTOCOLK ≥ 28 with ternary constraintsMethods comparable; raking may bemore efficient on simple configurations.MaxEnt advantagecroissant.Summary reading of the published result: no curve or measurement point is reconstructed here.

In this protocol, from 28 attributes onward in the presence of ternary constraints, Maximum Entropy Relaxation achieves better results according to the selected metric.

Summary reading of the published result. Detailed values are provided in the preprint. No measurement point is reconstructed on this page.

05Interpretation

A threshold, not general superiority.

Below this threshold, the two methods remain comparable according to the same metric. The result describes a dependence on complexity, not an absolute ranking. It applies to the protocol described in the preprint and to this metric.

06Limitation

Limit of this result

What this benchmark does not validate.

  • This benchmark validates only the behavior observed under this protocol.
  • It validates neither every configuration, nor every dataset, nor the behavioral conclusions of simulations.
07Source

Maximum Entropy Relaxation of Multi-Way Cardinality Constraints for Synthetic Population Generation

François Pachet · Jean-Daniel Zucker
ArXiv:2603.22558 — April 2026

Preprint — not peer reviewed

Your next decision

Which decision do you want to explore?

Describe your need. We can point you to the right level of support.

What if you tested
your next decision?

State your decision. See the future it produces.

Explore the product