- SIMULATED
- 3.2M residents · 28 car-use profiles · 24 months
- AT STAKE
- Acceptability · constrained mobility · political risk
CASE STUDIES · DECISION INTELLIGENCE
Real decisions.
Simulated before they are made.
Imagine All The People builds the synthetic populations affected by a decision, simulates their reactions to multiple scenarios, and reveals what may work, stall or shift.
46 CASE STUDIES 8 DECISION TYPES 13 CATEGORIES
- “ How can a ZFE be deployed in a metropolitan area without triggering a revolt among workers living on the outskirts? ”
- “How should a publicly disclosed cyberattack be handled without worsening the loss of trust?”
- How do you restore ROR vaccination coverage in lagging areas without triggering national polarization?
- “How can a 500 MW offshore wind farm be developed off a tourist coast without triggering local opposition that delays the project for five years?”
- “How can collective presence be increased without turning an organizational policy into a loss of autonomy?”
EXPLORE
Which decision
do you need to make ?
The same case can involve several types of decision.
CASES TO EXPLORE
One decision.
Multiple possible futures.
- SIMULATED
- 5 communication strategies compared on the same population
- AT STAKE
- Trust · credibility · duration
- SIMULATED
- 6 siting strategies tested with local stakeholders
- AT STAKE
- Acceptability · trust · fairness
- SIMULATED
- 2.4M parents · 18 hesitation typologies · 24 months
- AT STAKE
- Adoption · hesitation · local polarization
- SIMULATED
- 1.8M e-commerce customers · 13 profiles · 12 months
- AT STAKE
- Conversion · satisfaction · perceived fairness
- SIMULATED
- Profiles combining occupation, commuting constraints and collaboration needs
- AT STAKE
- Coordination · autonomy · commuting cost
THE PRINCIPLE
Before reality,
there is simulation.
- DECISION
- POPULATION
- SCENARIOS
- REACTIONS
- DECISION
A decision does not have one future. It has several. Imagine All The People simulates them with the populations concerned before reality decides.
BY SECTOR
Decisions change.
So do populations.
FRAUD PREVENTION01 CASES
Detection · targeting · control · acceptability
HUMAN RESOURCES & ORGANIZATION01 CASES
Work organization · presence · autonomy · coordination
ALL CASES
Explore the library.
BY DECISION
BY SECTOR
8 / 46
- “How should a publicly disclosed cyberattack be handled without worsening the loss of trust?”5 communication strategies compared on the same populationExplore
- “How can a product recall for a batch defect be initiated without turning a safety operation into a brand crisis?”240,000 units affected · 5 scenarios · 90 daysExplore
- “ Anticipating population behavior in the face of a moderate epidemic resurgence. ”4.8M adults · 9 attitudes-to-risk profiles · 12 weeksExplore
- “How can a new generation of smart meters be deployed without reactivating historical opposition?”3.8M households · 15 profiles · 36 monthsExplore
- “ Anticipate reactions to tighter unemployment-benefit conditions. ”4.2M jobseekers · 16 typologies · 18 monthsExplore
- “How can an incident at a regulated industrial site be managed without triggering a lasting local crisis?”620,000 local residents, workers and elected officials · 15 typologies · 12 monthsExplore
- “How can a company respond within 48 hours to a whistleblower's disclosure of a questionable internal practice without worsening the loss of market value?”1.8M stakeholders · 21 typologies · 72-hour cascadeExplore
- “How can media disclosure of inappropriate behavior by a senior executive be handled without damaging internal cohesion?”8,400 employees, extended to 24,000 profiles · 96 hours, then 6 monthsExplore
Real situations.
Confidentiality preserved.
The 46 cases presented are based on completed simulations. Organizations are not named where confidentiality requires it. Cases are described by sector, the decision tested and the findings produced.
You have a decision.
Test it before reality does.
Your inputs remain confidential.
