- SIMULATED
- 3.2M residents · 28 car-use profiles · 24 months
- AT STAKE
- Acceptability · constrained mobility · political risk
CASE STUDIES · DECISION INTELLIGENCE
Real decisions.
Simulated before they are made.
Imagine All The People builds the synthetic populations affected by a decision, simulates their reactions to multiple scenarios, and reveals what may work, stall or shift.
46 CASE STUDIES 8 DECISION TYPES 13 CATEGORIES
- “ How can a ZFE be deployed in a metropolitan area without triggering a revolt among workers living on the outskirts? ”
- “How should a publicly disclosed cyberattack be handled without worsening the loss of trust?”
- How do you restore ROR vaccination coverage in lagging areas without triggering national polarization?
- “How can a 500 MW offshore wind farm be developed off a tourist coast without triggering local opposition that delays the project for five years?”
- “How can collective presence be increased without turning an organizational policy into a loss of autonomy?”
EXPLORE
Which decision
do you need to make ?
The same case can involve several types of decision.
CASES TO EXPLORE
One decision.
Multiple possible futures.
- SIMULATED
- 5 communication strategies compared on the same population
- AT STAKE
- Trust · credibility · duration
- SIMULATED
- 6 siting strategies tested with local stakeholders
- AT STAKE
- Acceptability · trust · fairness
- SIMULATED
- 2.4M parents · 18 hesitation typologies · 24 months
- AT STAKE
- Adoption · hesitation · local polarization
- SIMULATED
- 1.8M e-commerce customers · 13 profiles · 12 months
- AT STAKE
- Conversion · satisfaction · perceived fairness
- SIMULATED
- Profiles combining occupation, commuting constraints and collaboration needs
- AT STAKE
- Coordination · autonomy · commuting cost
THE PRINCIPLE
Before reality,
there is simulation.
- DECISION
- POPULATION
- SCENARIOS
- REACTIONS
- DECISION
A decision does not have one future. It has several. Imagine All The People simulates them with the populations concerned before reality decides.
BY SECTOR
Decisions change.
So do populations.
FRAUD PREVENTION01 CASES
Detection · targeting · control · acceptability
HUMAN RESOURCES & ORGANIZATION01 CASES
Work organization · presence · autonomy · coordination
ALL CASES
Explore the library.
BY DECISION
BY SECTOR
14 / 46
- “How can collective presence be increased without turning an organizational policy into a loss of autonomy?”Profiles combining occupation, commuting constraints and collaboration needsExplore
- “How can a predictive AI system be designed to identify fraud-risk profiles without discriminating against legitimate customers or exposing the insurer to reputational risk?”2.2M policyholders · 17 attitudes-to-control profiles · 24 monthsExplore
- “How can a digital benefits-access platform be deployed without increasing non-take-up among the most vulnerable groups?”340,000 potential beneficiaries · 14 profiles · 24 monthsExplore
- Anticipate how the bulk-food aisle will evolve over 5 years in a general retailer.3.4M shoppers · 13 attitudes-to-bulk profiles · 60 monthsExplore
- “How can a DIY retailer's store concept be modernized without losing the professional tradespeople who account for 40 % of revenue?”240-store network · tradespeople = 40 % of revenueExplore
- “How can a new generation of smart meters be deployed without reactivating historical opposition?”3.8M households · 15 profiles · 36 monthsExplore
- “How can the planned closure of a thermal power plant be managed in its host territory?”1.1M residents and workers in the employment area · 14 profiles · 60 monthsExplore
- “How can a new mixed-use district be designed on a brownfield site so that social mix endures over 10 years?”1.4M residents and workers · 18 profiles · 120 monthsExplore
- “How can a historic city center be pedestrianized without driving away downtown residents?”420,000 residents and workers · 36 months of trajectoriesExplore
- “How can a tramway be introduced along a historic shopping corridor without driving out the local businesses that give the neighborhood its character?”340 exposed businesses · service launch at month 30 · 36 months projectedExplore
- “How can a media agency offer major-account clients a weekly European panel across 8 markets in 48 hours?”1.4M profiles generated each week · 8 markets · 48 hoursExplore
- How do you integrate 24-month behavioral projections into a strategy consulting firm's deliverables?340 consultants · 8 countries · 24 months of projected trajectoriesExplore
- How do you integrate a continuous consumer baseline into a major advertiser's internal insights function, alongside external panels?2.4M-profile baseline · 142 internal studies in year oneExplore
- “ How can a research institute offer large-account clients a behavioral study across 5 European markets in 3 weeks, when classic panel methodology would have required 4 months and triple the budget ? ”3 to 4 weeks per study, versus 4 months with a traditional panelExplore
Real situations.
Confidentiality preserved.
The 46 cases presented are based on completed simulations. Organizations are not named where confidentiality requires it. Cases are described by sector, the decision tested and the findings produced.
You have a decision.
Test it before reality does.
Your inputs remain confidential.
